Introduction: The Biggest Social Media Scandals of 2024
The year 2024 was packed with viral moments, controversies, and debates that dominated social media platforms. From celebrity feuds to corporate missteps, these scandals sparked discussions across the globe. Here’s a reverse countdown of the most shocking and talked-about social media scandals of 2024.
10. The AI-Generated Deepfake That Divided a Community
In January 2024, an audio clip allegedly featuring Eric Eiswert, principal of Pikesville High School in Maryland, making racist and antisemitic remarks went viral, igniting outrage in the diverse community of Pikesville. The clip appeared to capture Eiswert berating “ungrateful Black kids” and disparaging Jewish residents, prompting death threats and increased school security.
While many, including locals like Baltimore resident Alfie Malone, believed the audio reflected hidden truths about systemic issues, an investigation revealed otherwise. Education reporter Kristen Griffith uncovered that Eiswert and his representatives denied the allegations, claiming the clip was a deepfake. Despite skepticism from the public, Baltimore police confirmed in April that the recording was AI-generated.
The investigation traced the deepfake to Dazhon Darien, the school’s athletic director, who was under scrutiny for theft and facing non-renewal of his contract. Authorities alleged Darien used school computers to create the fake audio to discredit Eiswert. He was arrested while attempting to flee and now faces multiple charges, including theft and retaliation.
Though Eiswert was exonerated, the incident left lasting damage, highlighting the dangers of AI-driven misinformation and the importance of verifying content before sharing.
Source – BBC
9. The Unprecedented Tech Platform Data Breach
TikTok influencer Amy Downs, known as “Slot_7.0” or “Slotmachinequeen,” was arrested in Athens, Alabama, after it was revealed that she had fraudulently solicited nearly $1 million in donations for a fake charity. Downs claimed her organization supported victims of domestic violence and the homeless, but investigations uncovered that no such charity existed. Between 2021 and 2024, she raised funds through PayPal, CashApp, and Venmo, presenting herself as a compassionate advocate. Her emotional appeals garnered donations from followers worldwide.
However, authorities found that Downs had deposited the funds into her personal bank account, and no charity was registered under her name. She had also not been employed since 2020. Downs even made public appearances, including a red carpet interview, to boost her credibility, earning a nomination for an award for influencers supporting good causes.
After the fraud was exposed, Downs was charged with charitable fraud and tax evasion, with a bond set at $1,125,000. Her TikTok account has since been deleted, leaving her followers in shock. This case highlights the importance of verifying charitable causes before donating online.
Source – WSFA
7. Nike and Sky Ads Banned Over Misleading Tactics
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned ads from Nike and Sky for using misleading online tactics that could lead customers to spend more than intended.
Nike’s ad on social media promoted trainers for £26, accompanied by attention-grabbing emojis like an exploding head and black heart. However, the price applied only to children’s sizes (UK3 to UK6), not adult sizes. The ASA ruled that the ad misled customers into believing the discounted price applied to all sizes. Additionally, since children’s shoes are exempt from VAT, the perceived bargain was less significant than suggested. Nike defended itself by stating the ad was created by The Sole Supplier, an independent online marketplace, without its oversight.
Sky’s issue involved a free trial for its Now TV streaming service. Customers signing up were automatically enrolled in trials for Cinema and Boost services, which would auto-renew for a fee unless canceled within seven days. While the conditions were disclosed, the ASA found the information was in smaller text, less prominent colors, and placed below the “proceed” button, making it easy to overlook. Sky argued that its ad was clear and that free trial auto-renewals are widely understood, but the ASA disagreed.
The ASA’s action highlights its broader investigation into “dark pattern” tactics—design strategies that obscure pricing or add hidden fees, pressuring consumers into spending more. These tactics undermine transparency, prompting regulatory scrutiny to protect consumers.
Source – BBC
6. Twitter’s CEO Controversy
Elon Musk faced a significant setback in a court battle over his decision to terminate Twitter’s top executives following his acquisition of the company in 2022. A judge ruled on Friday that former CEO Parag Agrawal and other high-ranking officers could move forward with their claims that Musk fired them just before the deal closed, intentionally denying them severance pay. The ex-executives, who filed a complaint in March, pointed to a passage in Musk’s biography where he mentioned a “$200-million differential” in the deal, suggesting he aimed to avoid paying severance by rushing the acquisition process.
Agrawal, former legal head Vijaya Gadde, CFO Ned Segal, and general counsel Sean Edgett argue they are owed severance benefits, including one year’s salary and unvested stock options valued at the acquisition price. This ruling is part of ongoing litigation involving Musk’s handling of Twitter’s layoffs after he purchased the platform for $44 billion and rebranded it as X Corp. Musk’s legal team had tried to have the claims dismissed, but Judge Maxine Chesney rejected that request, allowing the lawsuits to proceed. This case follows other legal challenges over unpaid severance and employee compensation.
Source – Deccan Herald
5. TikTok’s Algorithm Under Fire
A Guardian Australia experiment revealed how TikTok’s algorithm can quickly funnel users into controversial and harmful content, even without direct interaction. In April, a new account was created with no prior data or activity. Initially, the app served generic content, but after a stabbing attack at a church in Sydney, TikTok began showing videos related to conservative Christian sermons. Over time, the algorithm intensified its focus, delivering increasingly extreme content, including pro-Trump, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ, and disturbing videos promoting violence, like one suggesting drag queens be fed into a woodchipper.
Unlike other platforms like Facebook and Instagram, TikTok’s algorithm appears to be highly sensitive to even the smallest interactions, such as the amount of time spent watching a video. This led to a rapid escalation in the type of content shown. Experts argue that this design prioritizes engagement over responsible content moderation, often amplifying harmful views. The experiment highlights concerns over the lack of transparency in how these algorithms operate, with experts calling for more accountability to ensure social responsibility in the platforms’ content recommendations.
Source – The Guardian
4. Viral Challenge Leads to Tragedy
Viral social media challenges, often promoted on platforms like TikTok, can quickly escalate from harmless fun to dangerous acts with serious consequences. Challenges like the Tide Pod challenge, the “In My Feelings” car dance, and the choking game have led to injuries and even fatalities. As these trends spread, many wonder: Who is liable when something goes wrong?
Liability can be complex and involve multiple parties. Social media platforms like TikTok often avoid responsibility through user agreements that limit their liability for user-generated content, thanks to protections like the Communications Decency Act. However, the creators of dangerous challenges could be held accountable if they knowingly encourage harmful actions. Friends or spectators who assist or encourage participants might also share liability, especially if they are aware of the risks involved.
Legal defenses could include claims of “assumption of risk” if the participant understood the dangers. As these cases often involve numerous legal complexities, those injured in viral challenges are advised to seek expert legal counsel to navigate the intricacies of potential claims and defenses. The rapid spread of such challenges highlights the importance of responsibility and caution in the digital age.
Source – Enjuris